Legal Opinion

Ryals v. U.S. Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 23, 1990No. 88-1352PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson Ryals, Jr., as administrator of the estate of his brother, David Ryals, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, United States Steel Corporation ("U.S. Steel"). The plaintiff alleged that the defendant caused the decedent's death by negligently or wantonly failing to maintain and secure a "switch rack."1 Ryals later voluntarily dismissed the negligence claim, and the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of U.S. Steel on the wantonness claim.

Because this Court, by this opinion, recognizes two distinct classes of trespassers to land — (1) mere trespassers, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Godfrey v. VinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Lewis v. ZellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Graves v. WildsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Esparza Rico v. FloresDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  3. Hume v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  4. Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API