Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oden v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1993No. 1910502, 1910503Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent from the majority's holding that the summary judgment was proper on the wantonness claim against Pepsi Bottling, and I concur in the result as to the remainder of the opinion.

The majority in this case holds that Oden cannot recover against Pepsi or Vendo because Mark's death was "a direct result of [his] knowing and intentional participation in a crime involving moral turpitude." 621 So.2d at 955. The majority also states that the absolute bar based upon the plaintiff's own criminal activity "promotes the desirable public policy objective of preventing those who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vines v. Plantation Motor LodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Moseley v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Fletcher v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Lyle v. BoulerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API