Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission v. Wiesman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1986No. 50447PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is an action in prohibition. We issued our preliminary writ and now make it permanent.

In the underlying action, Dorothy McGirt (claimant) processed a claim for unemployment benefits before the appropriate administrative tribunals. The last of these tribunals, the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission), denied her benefits. She then sought judicial review of the Commission’s decision. The Commission, as relator here, seeks our writ to prohibit the respondent judge from proceeding with his review on the grounds he lacks jurisdiction.

Section 288.210, RSMo 19781…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Duzer v. Industrial Commission of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Peredoe v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Schiff v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Clay v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission v. McGuireMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API