Grand Union Co. v. Mercado
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtGraffeo, J.
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights which found petitioner guilty of an unlawful discriminatory practice based on gender and age.
Respondent Martha Mailloux (hereinafter respondent), born on April 25, 1932, filed a charge of age and gender discrimination against petitioner, her employer, with the State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter DHR) in May 1991. Respondent had been working for petitioner as a frozen food selector since…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Raponi v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Capabilities, Inc. v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bennett v. Progressive Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Rio Mar Restaurant v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Anagnostakos v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- New York State Division of Human Rights v. Young Legends, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.