Legal Opinion
Bank of Commerce of Sulphur v. Webster
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 30, 1918No. 8861PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error from District Court, Murray County; F. B. Swank, judge’. ".Action .by the Bank of Commerce of Sul-phur, Okla., against C. J. Webster and another. . Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
The plaintiff in error, the Bank of Commerce of Sulphur, Okla., commenced this action in the district court of Murray county against C. J. Webster and T. E. Molacek, defendants in error, to recover on' a written guaranty as follows:
“Sulphur,' Okla., 6 — 19—11..“For value received, we hereby guarantee to the Bank of Commerce of Sulphur, Okla., payment of one note of D. A. Crafton, dated 2 — 6—11, $1,450.00 and one note of D. A. Crafton, dated 1 — 30—11. $204.00, both of said notes made payable to the Security State Bank.
“C. J. Webster
“T. E. Molacek.”
• The notes named in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth Nat. Bank of Dallas, Tex. v. BaughmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Taylor v. Johnson ex rel. A. W. & W. P. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Nicholson v. CombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Dickerman v. MinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Handsaker v. PedersenWashington Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Wolff v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Bank of Moberly v. MealsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- Strange v. Cooper Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Murphy v. Luthy Battery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.