Village of Plainfield v. American Cedar Designs, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Homer
The Village of Plainfield (village) filed a four-count complaint against American Cedar Designs (American), alleging that American was in violation of certain village ordinances. The trial court found the evidence insufficient on all but one count of the complaint, and the village appealed. We must determine whether the trial court erred in: (1) finding that American’s use of its property did not violate the flood control ordinance as alleged in count I, because it was a permitted nonconforming prior use; (2) finding American’s use of the property did not violate the zoning ordinance as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Barille v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Sobczak v. FlaskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- County of Du Page v. Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Zeitz v. Village of GlenviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Champaign v. SidesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- In Re Petition to Disconnect From Village of HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Village of Downers Grove v. Village Square III Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- City of Champaign v. SidesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- In re Petition to Disconnect Certain Territory From the Village of Campton Hills, Kane County, IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.