Legal Opinion
Barille v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 6, 1997No. 1-96-1414PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice South
Plaintiff, Patricia J. Barille (Barille), filed an amended complaint against defendants, Sears Roebuck & Co. and Allstate Insurance Co. et al. (Allstate), alleging breach of contract, common law fraud and violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1994)). The circuit court dismissed Barille’s amended complaint with prejudice pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1994)). Barille filed a motion to vacate and reconsider, arguing that her amended complaint…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Siegel v. Levy Organization Development Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Saunders v. Michigan Avenue National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- W.W. Vincent & Co. v. First Colony Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Brody v. Finch University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Vigortone Ag Products, Inc., Formerly Known as Provimi Acquisition Corporation v. Pm Ag Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Village of South Elgin v. Waste Management of Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Brown and Kerr, Inc. v. American Stores Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.