Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Schnitz

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1996No. 02A03-9605-CV-168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

James Vaughn appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time within which to file a praecipe. The sole issue for review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Vaughn’s motion for an extension of time to file a praecipe.

We affirm and dismiss.

*502The relevant procedural history reveals that the trial court entered judgment against Vaughn on April 3, 1995. Vaughn filed a motion to correct errors on May 3, 1995, and a hearing on the motion was set for July 24, 1995. Vaughn’s motion was denied on July 31, 1995. Notice of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lugar v. State Ex Rel. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Claywell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Markle v. Indiana State Teachers Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. CNA Insurance Companies (CNA) v. VellucciIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Impson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Wagner v. Estate of FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Christina Atkins, and Kyla Atkins, by her parent and next friend Christina Atkins v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Driver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. Estate of MillerIndiana Tax Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API