Christina Atkins, and Kyla Atkins, by her parent and next friend Christina Atkins v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

Case Summary and Issues

Appellant Christina Atkins appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for leave to file a belated appeal under Indiana Trial Rule 72(E). 1 Atkins raises two issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Atkins’s Rule 72(E) motion and (2) if so, whether the trial court erred by granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC (“Veolia”). Concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Atkins’s motion under Rule 72(E), we affirm. 2

Facts and…