Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Saseen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1994No. 22038PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice: 1

At issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs (Marshalls) can recover damages in excess of the $100,000.00 underinsured motorist coverage in the policy issued the plaintiff by its insurance carrier, Erie Insurance Company (Erie).

I

Mr. Marshall was injured in an automobile accident in January, 1989, when his vehicle was struck by a vehicle driven by Ms. Rosella Saseen. Ms. Saseen had liability insurance coverage with Motorist Mutual Insurance Company (Motorist Mutual). Suit was instituted against Ms. Saseen, and Erie was also served, pursuant to the underinsured motorist…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PitroloWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Jordan v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Burgess v. PorterfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API