Legal Opinion

United States v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1933No. 6567PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

The United States, for the purpose of improving navigation, constructed Widow’s Bar dam across the Tennessee river. Appellees Jacobs and Gunter, claiming that the dam holds back flood waters which injure their lands located above it, brought separate suits under the Tucker Act (28 USCA § 41 (20), to recover compensation for the damage done. From an adverse judgment Jacobs appealed and secured a reversal, this court holding that on the facts found by the District Judge he was entitled to compensation. Jacobs v. United States (C. C. A.) 45 F.(2d) 34. Before the second trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Boston Sand and Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conners Marine Co. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Mohr v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API