Legal Opinion
Mohr v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 7, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 2036PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, having successfully maintained his income tax refund action against defendant, was granted a judgment including his “taxable costs in the action expended”. The Clerk proceeded to tax the costs, the items in controversy being as follows:
Clerk — filing fee $15.00
Marshal — service of process 2.00
Marshal — summoning witnesses 9.50
Total $26.50
On a motion to review the taxing of costs, defendant directs attention to Rule 54(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., providing that "costs shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Ewing v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Walling v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Le Pire v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- United States v. Mahlon C. MohrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Georg Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960