Tombroek v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[T1] Frederik Tombroek (the appellant) was tried and convicted by a jury of first-degree sexual assault for sexually assaulting the victim, an adult woman with a mental disability. The appellant appeals the convietion on the grounds that the district court abused its discretion by allowing witnesses to testify to prior statements made to them by the victim. The appellant also argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove an element of the crime charged. Finding no abuse of discretion in admitting the prior statements and finding sufficient evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Curl v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Wilde v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Terry Earl Neidlinger, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Hunter Lee Hicks v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.