Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1947No. 34,325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

Winnifred B. Atwood, on her own behalf and, originally, as natural guardian of her three minor children, Thomas G., Alexander B., and Joyce W., brought action to procure a declaratory judgment as to the meaning and proper construction of the terms of a living trust created by Herbert J. Atwood during his lifetime. The action was brought against the trustees of the trust; William E. Atwood as residuary legatee of the estate of Jay H. Atwood, deceased; Arthur G. Ryan as administrator of the estate of Roland H. Tietze, deceased; and William E. Atwood. The court made findings of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Congdon v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Atwater v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. In re Tower's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Atwater v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Living Trust Created by AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Atwood v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Atwood v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. In Re Trust Created by AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. St. Paul Electrical Workers Welfare Fund v. CartierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API