Legal Opinion

St. Paul Electrical Workers Welfare Fund v. Cartier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1970No. 42300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment ordering appellants to pay respondent-intervenor’s attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses in the sum of $18,154.44, plus interest. The issue presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding that amount from a labor-management negotiated trust fund to an individual beneficiary who incurred these expenses by reason of his unsuccessful efforts to oppose a statutory petition by the trustees seeking court approval of a transfer of trust assets. Under the peculiar circumstances of the case, we find no abuse of discretion and are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Living Trust Created by AtwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Atwood v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Atwood v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. St. Paul Electrical Workers Welfare Fund v. CartierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Bush v. ArrowoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Club 167, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. In Re the Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API