United States v. Albert James Goodheim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*755ORDER
Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
The government petitions for rehearing, addressing the retroactivity issue which it failed to discuss in its responsive brief although it had been raised and argued in appellant’s opening brief. The government does not contend that our decision, 651 F.2d 1294, is inconsistent with any prior Ninth Circuit decision, including United States v. Potts, 528 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1975) (en banc), nor does it contest our view that Potts is controlling. Rather, the government argues only that our decision is in conflict with decisions of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Randall Wilford PricepaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Charles Michael PottsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John Andrew JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.