Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Michael Potts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1975No. 74--1817PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges. KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
We took this case in banc in order to re-examine the principal question presented in United States v. Hoctor, 487 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1973).
Appellee Potts, like Hoctor, was charged with a federal crime requiring as an element the defendant’s prior conviction of a felony.1 Both Potts and Hoctor had been convicted of a felony under the laws of the State of Washington, but before the commission of their alleged federal crimes each had caused…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- In Re FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. John Richard LilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Byron Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Randall Wilford PricepaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- ROLDANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
- United States v. Eddie Jackson Houston, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.