Legal Opinion

Condon v. Bank of California, N.A.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1988No. A8501-00682; CA A45027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIGGS, J., pro tempore.

Plaintiffs appeal from an ORCP 67B judgment. They challenge trial court orders that granted defendant’s ORCP 21 motions to dismiss certain claims from their second and third amended complaints. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs are four of the five beneficiaries of a trust, and defendant is the trustee. Plaintiffs seek damages for defendant’s alleged negligent breach of fiduciary duty and, under ORS 128.051, a refund of excessive fees allegedly charged by defendant. The trial court granted defendant’s ORCP 21A motion to dismiss the negligence claim on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Booras v. UyedaOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wood v. HoneymanOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hatcher v. United States Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Telephone & Data Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Oregon Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Mest v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Godfrey v. KaminDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  5. McDonald v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API