Legal Opinion
Getty Oil Co. v. Catalytic, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided April 10, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEBELEIN, Judge.
This is an action to enforce an indemnification contract. After a jury trial, a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff, Getty Oil Company (hereinafter “Getty”), and the only remaining issue is the extent to which Getty is entitled to an award of pre-judgment interest.
On August 8, 1972, Carlton L. Loden and his wife, Shirley E. Loden, filed a personal injury suit against Getty Oil Company for injuries sustained by Mr. Loden while performing, as an employee of Catalytic, Inc. (hereinafter “Catalytic”), certain maintenance work at Getty’s Delaware refinery. Loden v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Nardo v. Guido DeAscanis & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1969
- Frazer v. Bigelow Carpet Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- E. M. Fleischmann Lumber Corp. v. Resources Corp. InternationalDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- American General Corp. v. Continental Airlines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Colonial Imports v. Carlton Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Farm Credit Bank v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.