Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Kansas Midland Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Douglas District Court. Action by Martin L. Sargent against the Kansas Midland Railroad Company and others to enforce a claim for certain stock. On a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brought error. He subsequently died, and his administrator, John A. Sargent, was substituted as plaintiff. The facts fully appear in the opinion herein, filed May 7, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This action was brought by Martin L. Sargent, who claimed he was an equitable stockholder in the Kansas Midland. Railroad Company, subsequently consolidated with the Lawrence & Topeka Railway Company, and thereafter known as the Kansas City, Topeka & Western Railroad Company, upon the following instrument, acceptance, and assignment:

“KANSAS MIDLAND BAILBOAD, OONSTBUOTION DEPABTMENT. GEOBGE D. CHAPMAN, OONTBAOTOB AND GENEBAL MANAGES.
“Topeka, Kas., July 1, 1874. “Kansas Midland Railroad Company, H. Bartling, President:
“Please deliver to T.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Bestor v. WathenIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Scott v. DepeysterNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  4. Ryan v. Leavenworth, Atchison & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  5. Jackson v. TraerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delano v. KitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  2. Stewart v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Leader Publishing Co. v. Grant Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Peckham v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API