Heffner v. Murphy
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN E. JONES III, District Judge.
THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:
Pending before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Rec.Doc.il). For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
Plaintiffs 1 initiated the instant action by lodging a massive Complaint against the Defendants 2 on May 20, 2008 alleging claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 3 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 4 for deprivations of rights secured by the United…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Behar v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corr.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Heffner v. MurphyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012