Legal Opinion

Leday v. Clairol, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-620PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

571 So.2d 866 (1990)

Lisa LEDAY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CLAIROL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-620.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

December 12, 1990.

Chuck R. West, Mamou, for plaintiff-appellee.

Dauzat, Falgoust, Caviness & Bienvenu, Jimmy L. Dauzat, Opelousas, for defendant-appellant.

Before STOKER, LABORDE and YELVERTON, JJ.

STOKER, Judge.

This is a products liability suit by Lisa Leday to recover damages and costs for a moderate scalp irritation and loss of hair allegedly caused by application of Clairol's "Nice `N Easy" hair color kit. Plaintiff alleges that the hair color…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bloxom v. BloxomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Ingram v. Caterpillar MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Thomas v. Gillette CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Walker v. Maybelline Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Booker v. REVLON REALISTIC PROF. PRODUCTS, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. JESUIT HIGH SCH. OF NEW ORLEANSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,855 Joe C. Mozeke and Lizzie B. Mozeke v. International Paper Co., and Kamyr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. Thomas v. Clairol Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Jordan v. RyanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API