Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Clairol Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1991No. 90-171PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
583 So.2d 108 (1991)
Leo THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CLAIROL INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-171.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
June 26, 1991.
Gilbert J. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellee.
Dauzat, Falgoust, Cariness, Bienvenu & Stipl, Jimmy L. Dauzat, Opelousas, for defendant-appellant.
Before GUIDRY and YELVERTON, JJ., and, CULPEPPER, Judge Pro Tem.
CULPEPPER, Judge, Pro Tem.
This is a products liability case. The plaintiff, Leo Thomas, suffered contact dermatitis of the scalp after using defendant's hair dye, "Nice-N-Easy". The substantial issue is whether…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bloxom v. BloxomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Walker v. Maybelline Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Leday v. Clairol, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jack v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Lozano v. Touro InfirmaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000