Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2001No. 22172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

In this paternity case, the petitioners are the mother and her minor son. The respondents are the minor son’s statutorily presumed father and the minor son’s alleged father. The appellant is the minor son’s mother.

In April 1987, Petitioner-Appellant Jane Doe (Mother) married Respondent-Appellee John Doe (Presumed Father). During them marriage, Mother gave birth to a daughter (Daughter) on October 4, 1988, and to a son (Son) on July 7, 1992. Mother and Presumed Father were divorced by a March 22, 1994 Divorce Decree (1994 Divorce Decree) that awarded Mother…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorrance v. LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hall v. LalliArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Blackshear v. BlackshearHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Guilford County ex rel. Child Support Enforcement Unit v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API