Legal Opinion

Henry v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1913No. 6812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. — Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues

1. March 2; 1907, T. C. Henry began suit against the Montezuma Water & Land Company, The Denver National Bank, The Colorado State Bank of Durango, and John V. Farwell of Chicago. The original complaint contained first, second and third clauses of action which were counts or duplicate statements of the same transaction, and upon which there could be but one recovery. The defendant The Montezuma Water & Land Company, hereinafter for convenience called the ditch company, owned an irrigation system in the Montezuma valley which was in use, but not completed. All the stock and bonds of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Waukon v. StrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Anthony v. SlaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClauseWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Enright v. Midland Sampling & Ore Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Rittmaster v. RichnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Magnuson v. Smith and Saetveit, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Reader v. FarrissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API