Legal Opinion

Rittmaster v. Richner

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1900No. 1732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the District Court of Boulder County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

Action for breach of covenants of warranty in a convey*362anee of real estate. A demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the complaint, and the plaintiff amended. On motion the amended complaint was stricken out on the ground that it was not an amendment, and added nothing, in any material particular, to the averments of the original complaint. The court then entered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff prosecutes error.

The first complaint set out in full a deed from the defendant to-the plaintiff and two others, executed on the 24th day of February, 1880, and alleged the conveyance by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurd v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. DicksonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Foltz v. MansonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Henry v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Davis v. GourdinColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API