Legal Opinion
Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Crow
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 8, 1999No. Record 980392PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
In this appeal, the dispositive issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached an express warranty and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.
In the summer of 1989, John R. Crow was invited by John Atherton, then a sales representative for Tidewater Yacht Agency, Inc. (Tidewater), to ride on a new model sport fishing boat known as a 3486 Trophy Convertible, manufactured by Bayliner Marine Corporation (Bayliner). At that time, Tidewater was the exclusive authorized…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- W. S. Carnes, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Tallmadge v. Aurora Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hubbard v. Dresser, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Kraft Foods North America, Inc. v. Banner Engineering & Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- COMMONWEALTH TRANSP. COM'R v. Target Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Dorman v. State Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- HOFFMAN FAMILY v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.