Legal Opinion

Tallmadge v. Aurora Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 31, 1979No. 6811-3-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Aurora Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., appeals and Kenneth Tallmadge cross-appeals from a judgment awarding Tallmadge $920 in attorney's fees in his action for restitution and damages because of an alleged breach of warranty of merchantability and a violation of the Consumer Protection Act.

Tallmadge went to Aurora Chrysler to purchase a new car in response to an advertisement stating: "Brand New 1977 Chrysler New Yorker, Sr. #146982, this one only $6688." He purchased an automobile which he believed to be the one in the advertisement, but later learned that it had a different serial number, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Ralph Williams' North West Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Panag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Miller v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API