HOFFMAN FAMILY v. City of Alexandria
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Justice BARBARAMILANO KEENAN.
In this appeal, we determine whether a city lawfully initiated condemnation proceedings to relocate a storm water sewer as part of its public utility system on the ground that the condemnation was necessary for development of a particular area under the city's comprehensive plan.
We state the evidence in the light most favorable to the City of Alexandria (the City), the prevailing party in the circuit court. Stanley v. Webber, 260 Va. 90 , 92, 531 S.E.2d 311 , 312 (2000); Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Crow, 257 Va. 121 , 126, 509 S.E.2d 499 , 502 (1999). This…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Fallsburg, &c. Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Stanley v. WebberSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- COMMONWEALTH TRANSP. COM'R v. Target Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Logan v. City Council of City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- 3232 Page Ave. Condo. Ass'n v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Akeem Alee Calokoh v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.