Legal Opinion
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 8, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. 390 (1983)
456 A.2d 518
KISHWAR MIRZA AND MASOOD MIRZA, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
FILMORE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 29, 1982.
Decided February 8, 1983.
Cathe McAuliffe argued the cause for appellants (John M. Skevin, attorney).
Allan H. Rogers argued the cause for respondent (Hein, Smith & Berezin, attorneys; Allan H. Rogers and Edward D. Bortz, on the brief).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.
In Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146, 157 (1981), we held that commercial landowners are…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roberts v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.