Williams v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Totten J.:
Williams is indicted under the act of 1825. ch 63, § 3, for repossessing himself of land after being dispossessed in an action of forcible entry and detainer. After the recovery by the plaintiff in the action of forcible entry and detainer, an officer went upon the land to execute the writ of possession. The defendant was absent, and the officer gave the wife and children four days to yield up possession, which they did, and the officer returned afterwards and found them gone.
The Court below held this to be a dispossession within the meaning of the act. In this there was no error.
Jud…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. City of MadisonvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. . SprouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KeelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.