Legal Opinion

Hajek v. Radio Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 20, 1936No. 5652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court finding valid and infringed three patents: 1,893,466, issued to Gowen, January 3, 1933; 1,718,206, to Mouromtseff, June 18, 1929; and 1,374,679, to Pratt, April 12, 1921. In the first-mentioned patent, claims 3, 6, 11, and 12 are involved, in the second, claim 4, and in the third, claims 2 and 4. Claim 2 of Pratt the court did not mention in its findings.

Gowen, 1,893,466, covers a specific form of construction of a vacuum tube, wherein are tied together all the elements so as to hold them in position as an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Automatic Arc Welding Co. v. A. O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson Laboratories, Inc. v. Meissner Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. International Cellucotton Products Co. v. Sterilek Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. H C Products Co. v. Air Vent, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Ramos v. State of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API