Ingram v. Dailey
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Ringgold District Court. — Hon. B. L. Parish, Judge. Landlord’s attachment to recover rent alleged to be due upon a written contract of lease of a farm. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.
*189i. countertice. *188The original contract of lease was between John M. Clayton as lessor, and defendant Charles A. Dailey as lessee. The stipulation as to rent reads as follows: “For the rent of said premises, the said second party agrees to pay first party one hundred and eighty-one dollars, said *189rental to be paid promptly as follows: Forty dollars cash, one hundred and ten dollars the first of January, 1902, thirty-one dollars to be worked out on farm at one dollar per day.” There was also a stipulation to the effect that “a failure to pay the rent as agreed upon, or to comply with any of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dixon v. NiccollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Sutton v. GriebelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Murdy v. SkylesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Horner v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Kaul v. American Independent Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Wells v. Hocking Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- I. G. L. Racquet Club v. Midstates Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Cox v. Fleisher Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.