Legal Opinion

Wells v. Hocking Valley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1908PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court.— Hon. B. W. Pkeston, Judge. Action at law- to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered in procuring the sale of property. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

The petition alleges that the Hocking Coal Company, a coal mining corporation, entered .into an agreement with plaintiff, whereby the latter undertook the effort to find a purchaser for all of the property of every kind and character owned by said corporation, and, if successful, was to receive for the services so rendered a margin of the selling price in excess of a stated minimum or net sum to be paid to the company. This agreement, it is alleged, was in part written and in part oral. The written portion of said alleged contract is to be found in two instruments known in the record as “…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Gelatt v. RidgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Sutton v. GriebelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Clinch Valley Coal & Iron Co. ex rel. Grove v. WillingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Graffam v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mayor of Jackson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Woolfolk v. Jack Kennedy Chevrolet CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Banwart v. ShullenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Root v. Shadbolt & MiddletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Robson v. United Pacific Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API