Evans & Martin v. Tucker
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Wise. Tried below before the Hon. 0. 0. Potter.
1Opinion of the Court
Willie, Chief Justice. —
The assignments of error in this cause bring in question the action of the court in quashing the attachment sued out by appellants. The motion to quash contained two grounds: 1. The affidavit upon which the attachment was based did not allege that the defendant was justly indebted to the plaintiff. 2. The affidavit alleged that the entire debt would fall due on ¡November 22, 1881; whereas the petition shows a part then due, and the balance to become due ¡November 22, 1881.
Our attachment law requires that, before the writ shall issue, the plaintiff, his agent or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caldwell v. HaleyTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Cox v. ReinhardtTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Lowry v. StoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
- Wooster v. McGeeTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Marshall v. AlleyTexas Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Crim v. HarmonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- S.G. Gonzales v. Louisa M. De GonzalesTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Donnelly v. ElserTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. Mooring & BlanchardTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Beville v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.