Fluor Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

OPINION AND ORDER

BLOCK, Judge.

I. Introduction

This ease is one of first impression. It involves an action brought by the plaintiff, Fluor Daniel Enterprises, Inc. (“Fluor”), a government contractor, under the Contract Disputes Act.1 The challenge is to a government contracting officer’s “final decision” demanding repayment by Fluor of an alleged overpayment of fees which defendant claims exceeded the fees allowable under federal law. Specifically, the contracting officer challenged that Fluor was paid $2,560,413 more for architectural and engineering (“A & E” or “design”) services rendered to…