Legal Opinion

Highmark, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 22, 2007No. 05-1030TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This tax refund case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The parties presented their arguments in briefs and at a hearing on June 20, 2007. Plaintiff Highmark, Inc., which is the successor in interest to Pennsylvania Blue Shield and its subsidiaries, (“Highmark”) seeks at least $21,329,919, plus interest, from the defendant the United States, for alleged overpayment of federal income taxes for tax years 1991 through 1995. Specifically, Highmark claims deductions for losses from the termination and/or cancellation of health care coverage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Capital Blue Cross and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Trigon Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Datamill, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Hospital Services Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API