Legal Opinion

Hadnot v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 10, 2000No. 14-99-00264-CRPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On December 29, 1999, appellant filed a motion to dismiss his appointed counsel, Michael B. Charlton, and proceed pro se on appeal. In response to this motion, this court issued an order on January 6, 2000, requiring the trial court to conduct a hearing and determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; (2) whether appellant wishes to discharge his appointed attorney and proceed with his appeal pro se; (3) whether the waiver of assistance of counsel is made voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently; and (4) whether appellant is fully aware of the dangers and…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Cain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  5. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. Webb v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Cormier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Ex parte DupuyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Alanda Suzanne Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API