Legal Opinion
Alaska Center for the Environment v. Reilly
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 8, 1992No. C90-595RPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PERFORM THEIR MANDATORY DUTIES UNDER SECTION 303(d) OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion to compel defendants to perform their mandatory duties under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Having reviewed the motion, all documents filed in support and in opposition, all supplemental memoranda and declarations, and having twice heard oral argument, the court finds and rules as follows:
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Alaska Center for the Environment, et al. (collectively “ACE”), 1…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Crosby Wilfredo Orantes-Hernandez v. Richard ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Idaho Sportsmen's Coalition v. BrownerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1996
- Sierra Club v. HankinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Alaska Center for the Environment v. BrownerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Sierra Club v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.