Legal Opinion
Crosby Wilfredo Orantes-Hernandez v. Richard Thornburgh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 1990No. 88-6192PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
I. Introduction
This is an appeal from the entry of a permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in a class action against United States government immigration officials. The plaintiff class is composed of Salvadoran nationals who are eligible to apply for political asylum, and who have been or will be taken into custody by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). The district court’s injunction, together with its extensive supporting findings of fact and conclusions of law, is reported in Orantes-Hernandez v. Meese, 685 F.Supp. 1488 (C.D.Cal.1988)…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Barbara Doty, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. County of Lassen, and Ronald D. Jarrell as Sheriff, and IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Defenders of Wildlife v. BrownerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Walters v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ivan Batanic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.