McDaniel v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C.J.:
This is an action to recover benefits under a health insurance policy. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s holding that her condition was not covered by the policy’s insuring clause definition:
“Sickness means any sickness or disease of a Covered Person first manifesting itself while this policy is in force with respect to such person and shall include all complications arising therefrom.” (Emphasis added.)
The case was submitted to the trial court on deposition testimony, exhibits and stipulations. The court entered the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
“1. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southards v. Central Plains InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Bishop v. Capitol Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Minear v. Benefit Association of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
3Cited by13 opinions
- Preferred Risk Life Ins. Co. v. SandeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Pitcher v. Principal Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. CicconeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Mogil v. California Physicians Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Nesbitt v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.