Legal Opinion

Ankoanda v. Walker-Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1996No. A067744PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.—

I. Introduction

This appeal arises from a dispute between second cousins, Paula Dee Walker-Smith (Walker-Smith) and Nobantu Ankoanda (Ankoanda), 1 regarding the ownership of a parcel of real property located at 215 St. Charles Street in San Francisco (the property). Finding mutual mistake in the sequential deeds granting Walker-Smith an interest in the property, the trial court quieted title in Ankoanda and awarded Walker-Smith compensation for improvements and labor in the amount of $25,000 under Civil Code section 1692.

Walker-Smith appeals, alleging numerous errors below.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Muktarian v. BarmbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Salazar v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. CRESTMAR OWNERS ASS'N v. StapakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Eleanor Licensing LLC v. Classic Recreations LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Aiuto v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Eleanor Licensing LLC v. Classic Recreations LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API