SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade Securities
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
MOSK, J., Concurring.
I concur in the result, but write separately to discuss the standards of review to be employed by the trial court and by this court when a party seeks to vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrators refused to postpone a hearing.
The grounds for vacating an arbitration award are set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2, subdivision (a)* 1 (section 1286.2). (See Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d *1203899] .)2 If the trial court determines that any of those grounds exists, it “shall vacate the award.” (§…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Laws v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.