Legal Opinion · Concurrence

SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade Securities

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 2007No. B191166Published

1Concurrence

MOSK, J., Concurring.

I concur in the result, but write separately to discuss the standards of review to be employed by the trial court and by this court when a party seeks to vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrators refused to postpone a hearing.

The grounds for vacating an arbitration award are set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2, subdivision (a)* 1 (section 1286.2). (See Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1 [10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d *1203899] .)2 If the trial court determines that any of those grounds exists, it “shall vacate the award.” (§…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Malek v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Laws v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API