Legal Opinion
In Re Omeprazole Patent Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 2001No. MDL Docket 1291PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the motion of defendant Genpharm, Inc. (“Genp-harm”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 for summary judgment of invalidity and non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,599,794 (“the ’794 patent”), 5,629,305 (“the ’305 patent”) and 5,093,342 (“the ’342 patent”).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated for pre-trial purposes before this Court the patent infringement suits filed by Astra Aktiebolag, Aktiebolaget Hassle, KBI-E, Inc., KBI, Inc. and Astrazeneca, L.P. (collectively “Astra”) in response to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Organon Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- R & M Jewelry, LLC v. Michael Anthony Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Horn v. SOUTHERN UNION COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Speedfit LLC v. Chapco Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2020