Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 26, 2004No. Nos. 03-6080(L), 03-6084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

We assume familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this protracted litigation. See Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. Princeton Economic Int’l Ltd., 7 Fed.Appx. 65 (2d Cir.2001) (unpublished opinion) (“Armstrong P’); Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Armstrong, 269 F.3d 109 (2d Cir.2001) (motions panel) (“Armstrong II”); Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n v. Armstrong, 284 F.3d 404 (2d Cir.2002) (per curiam) (“Armstrong III”).

In January 29, 2003 and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Alan ShiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Huber v. Marine Midland BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission, Alan M. Cohen, Receiver-Appellee v. Martin A. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. ANTONIAK v. ARMSTRONGDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Armstrong v. GuccioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API