Truman v. Scott
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
"Woods, J.
— The counsel for the appellee have filed a supplemental brief, in which it is claimed that the judgment should *259Re affirmed or the appeal dismissed for the reasons: 1st. There are no sufficient errors assigned; 2d. The names of all who were defendants in the circuit court are not set out in the assignment of errors, as required by rule number one of this court; 3d. Afinalr judgment was rendered against John H. Truman, Jeremiah Zartman, Charles F. Marehant, Malinda Truman, and others, while none have appealed or assigned errors but John H. Truman, and a final decision can not be made…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christy v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Peoples Savings Bank v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Bridgewater v. BridgewaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeHaven v. DeHavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Higbee v. RodemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Wilson v. HefflinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Dobbins v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881