Legal Opinion

Truman v. Scott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

"Woods, J.

— The counsel for the appellee have filed a supplemental brief, in which it is claimed that the judgment should *259Re affirmed or the appeal dismissed for the reasons: 1st. There are no sufficient errors assigned; 2d. The names of all who were defendants in the circuit court are not set out in the assignment of errors, as required by rule number one of this court; 3d. Afinalr judgment was rendered against John H. Truman, Jeremiah Zartman, Charles F. Marehant, Malinda Truman, and others, while none have appealed or assigned errors but John H. Truman, and a final decision can not be made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christy v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Bridgewater v. BridgewaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeHaven v. DeHavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Higbee v. RodemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wilson v. HefflinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Newman v. ManningIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Dobbins v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API