Legal Opinion
State v. Pollander
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 5, 1997No. 96-387PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.
Defendant Robert Pollander appeals the Lamoille District Court’s denial of his motion to dismiss in a civil license-*303suspension proceeding, and challenges adverse findings by the court. Defendant argues that (1) the issue of his blood-alcohol content (BAC) on the night of his arrest was resolved in his favor by an earlier criminal jury verdict and was thus precluded from reconsideration at the civil suspension hearing; and (2) the district court erred by failing to consider defendant’s necessity defense. We affirm.
Defendant was stopped by a law enforcement officer while driving in Morristown…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- MacKey v. MontrymSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lubinsky v. Fair Haven Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- N.A.S. Holdings, Inc. v. PafundiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In re Woodstock Community Trust and Housing Vermont PRDSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re Appeal of GulliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.