Legal Opinion

State v. Hafner

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1993No. Cr. 920329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

David Hafner appeals from a criminal judgment entered by the Mercer County Court convicting him of a violation of Section 61-14-16, N.D.C.C. We affirm.

On or about August 10, 1992, the Mercer County State’s Attorney received a complaint that Hafner was allowing water from his irrigation system to fall on a section line open to public use. The State’s Attorney notified Hafner of the complaint by letter, and warned that further incidents of water on the section line would result in criminal charges. Hafner denied receiving the letter, but admitted to knowledge of the letter’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. GefrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ames v. Rose Township Board of Township SupervisorsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. BarendtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. PachecoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Zimmerman v. Minot Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API