Legal Opinion

Ames v. Rose Township Board of Township Supervisors

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1993No. Civ. 920392PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

LeRoy Ames appealed from an amended declaratory judgment holding that certain cattle guards and gateways constructed across section lines were in compliance with North Dakota law, and thereby denying his amended petition for a writ of man damus which sought to compel their removal. We affirm.

Ames has an interest in certain non-contiguous real estate located in Rose Township, Stutsman County, North Dakota, on which he conducts a farming and ranching operation. The disjointed nature of Ames’s holdings requires him to utilize public highways to transport his farming…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Walcott Township v. SkaugeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Small v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Westman v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Witthauer v. Burkhart Roentgen, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Little v. TraynorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Anderson v. Richland County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Graber v. Logan County Water Resource BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API