Legal Opinion

COUNCIL 13, AFSCME v. Casey

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1991No. 200 M.D. 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Petitioners, a state employees’ union and two representative members (AFSCME), has brought this original jurisdiction petition for review in the nature of mandamus and equity proceedings, seeking a peremptory mandamus order or preliminary injunction to compel the Commonwealth and the Governor to pay 19,781 employees of long standing, hired before October of 1978, their salary payments due to be paid on July 5, 1991 and July 12, 1991.

The court allowed the intervention, as additional petitioners, of another state employees’ union and two of its members (PSSU), because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. IsraelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Equitable Gas Co. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stilp v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. NATIONAL RIFLE ASS'N v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Firearm Owners Against Crime v. Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API